Once upon a time before I got this internship as a blogger, I had enthusiastically emailed my resume to a law firm, requesting to be an attachment student at their firm. I was turned down because they "only want second years and above."
Disappointed but unable to do anything, I saw MALSA's message on Facebook telling us Intermediate students to send our resume to Logein to get attachment (a.k.a. internship) at law firms which are collaborating with ELawyer. I sent mine, but after what happened with my first experience of asking for an attachment, my hope weren't high. And I was kind of right for not hoping for anything, because until now, I had not got any reply from them.
So I "adjusted" my hopes. I told myself: I want to work at a law firm, whatever position offered to me. And the scale of the law firm does not matter. As long as it is a law firm, and as long as they employ me, be it to cuci tandas or bancuh kopi, I don't care - that's my bottom line.
(and I also decided since law firms don't find me good enough yet, I might as well as get a job that reflects my interests. Hence this internship.)
Because I'm a law student so I want to gain some experience working at a law firm. And also, because, because... if I work at law firm I only have to work for five days. I don't wanna work on Saturdays and Sundays. =P
So one day I was wandering around Maluri aimlessly (wearing some old tee and old jeans) and I stumbled across this law firm which posted up a notice "GENERAL CLERK WANTED." It said "walk-in interview", so without hesitation, I climbed the stairs and pressed the doorbell. A very sweet-looking lady opened the door for me.
Sweet lady: "Yes?"
Me: "Good afternoon, I saw the notice requiring general clerks. Are you still hiring?"
Sweet lady: "Yes. You are here for interview?"
Me: "Umm, yes. (The truth was, I didn't prepare anything. I didn't have my resume with me, nothing. I just "accidentally" came across this. So I got... tongue-tied.) But erm, you need resume when you go for interview right (I'm seriously talking nonsense! Damn it!) but I didn't have the resume with me now, so umm is it okay if I come for interview tomorrow, umm can you give me a specific time?"
Sweet lady: "Before 1, or after 2 will be fine."
Me: "Okay, thank you so much... See you tomorrow."
That definitely was a lousy first impression. Real lousy. I couldn't believe myself.
The next day, wanting to overturn my lousy first impression, I went to the firm in white collared shirt and ironed pants and a pair of Vincci heels which really hurt my toes, carrying a transparent file containing my resume and certs. I reached there at 2pm sharp. I was so punctual.
Me (said brightly): "Hi, I'm here for the job interview."
Sweet lady: "Please wait for a while..."
So I was TOO punctual.
Anyway. Keen to leave an impression that I'm a suitable candidate who loves to update myself whenever and wherever possible, I glanced around the office and picked up a business magazine to read.
Waited for ten minutes or so and another smart gent and smart lady entered. The sweet lady indicated to them of my presence, and the smart lady handed me a form. She even had a very smart smile. It's like, when she smiled at you, you just get the impression that she's smart. She had the smart aura.
Once the form was filled, she gestured me to a desk for typing test. I was asked to type out some law document. Some kind of letter.
With lots and lots of symbols. Slashes. Brackets. Damn it!
I may be fast at typing mere words (but not fast enough to turn into Alien on Typing Maniac... I still remained a space man, lol), but I am not familiar with symbols. "Shit" was the only thing on my mind that time. Plus the smart lady told me to "type out in exactly the same format as this document is typed."
The formats. What formats I remembered apart from Tab and Paragraph? Another damn!
Had to try my best anyway if I want the job... I was sure I made no errors in typing when I was done, but I knew I made a few regarding the format. And I was slowed down by the symbols. Not significantly, though. Phew. Well, at least, I did my best.
The smart lady printed out what I typed and gave it to the smart gent, with my filled form and photocopied IC.
(So I don't need resume after all! Sheesh)
The smart gent then gestured me into his office. The interview began with a formal handshake, a couple of formal questions regarding my education background, and then I somehow told him I'm taking LLB at ATC, and he went...
Smart Gent: "So you are from ATC! I myself am from ATC too. Who are your lecturers?"
Me (surprised to know that my interviewer is my senior): "There's Mr Reuben, I don't know if you know him, but he was featured in The Star yesterday..."
(and the paragraph Mr Reuben gave in the article was exactly the same thing he told us when we attended his first lecture, and it was the same thing he said during Edu Fair when introducing ATC to the visitors... It'll never change, I suppose)
Smart Gent: "Reuben de Rozario? He's my coursemate! Is Santhi Latha there? Still very thin?"
Me: "Yes, she's still teaching us, and yes, she's still very thin! She's a great lecturer though."
Smart Gent: "Tell her to eat more, or else any gust of wind will blow her off. Who else?"
Me: "Let's see, there's Ms Mary George..."
Smart Gent: "That ciplak mat salleh with hazel eyes?"
LOL, the way the Smart Gent described one of my favourite lecturer! It's the first time I actually lol-ed with an interviewer during a job interview! Not the kind of fake laughs, but real laughs!
The job interview then turned into an informal chat about ATC. Funny how things happened. Fate is indeed a funny thing.
Smart Gent was keen to give me an opportunity (but he became hesitant when he learned that I only intend to work for two months. "I have to train you, you know, and you will leave once you are trained. It's terrible for me," that's what he said. I guess I should have lied, but somehow I couldn't bring myself to do it.) He even told me to "don't expect too many clerical work here", because "I don't want to hire you as a general clerk. You are doing LLB, and of course you should learn more about how law firm operates." It's really unexpected, you know. I come here to work as a general clerk, but I get something like an attachment, which was something I was rejected couple of weeks ago and had dare not to hope for anymore since then!
The interview only lasted for ten minutes or so. We then had an informal chat about legal career. A real long one which lasted for about an hour (what an "interview"). He admitted he definitely won't waste time telling all these things to a normal person applying to be general clerk. But he said, I am a law student, and I had came to his firm, and he should let me know what kind of future I should be expecting. "It will be long working hours with revenues that are disproportionate to your hard work" is what he told me. Some stuff he said was too technical and procedural to be understood (I pretended to look like I understood anyway), but most of the time, I really enjoyed listening to him. Some quotations from him:
- What you really need in litigation is not language nor skill, but passion. Passion makes you argue well.
- Despite what everyone tells you, law is NOT a profession. It is nothing more than business. Like every other business out there, what your clients tell you are your commands. So you end up becoming very choosy and picky about which client you want, because you don't want one that brings you troubles or march up to your office to beat you into a pulp.
- Some lawyers are too personal to be professional. They take cases too seriously and they get emotional about it when they lose. That is not professional at all.
- To litigate for criminal cases, you deal with idiots. That's why, don't litigate for criminal cases. You will go against your conscience for idiots, and you can't sleep well. On the other hand, to litigate for civil cases... Well, strictly speaking, you are still dealing with idiots. And most of the time, it will be idiots pretending to be smart, because they had read about the law, and they think they understood it, but they had somehow misconstrued it. And these idiots are really hard to deal with. I really rather deal with the uneducated idiots that listen and believe in me rather than dealing with the educated idiots who reiterate all the time, and I ended up fighting with them, not fighting for them. It is ridiculous.
He told me his firm dealed with conveyancing mostly, which I had accidentally told him I thought it was boring (damn it! What makes me said that?!). He smirked. I couldn't help it but to ask, had he ever found conveyancing boring? He heaved a sigh and told me: "I cannot afford to get bored of conveyancing. I have a family, there's burden on my shoulders. I have to always do something to think that conveyancing is not boring."
Reminds me of a quotation: In the end none of us die as a virgin, because life F us all up. Yeah, most of us ended up bowing to reality. The day I choose to do law, I had already bowed to reality.
But really, this is the best quote I heard from him:
"I study law because I sucks at everything else."
Haha! And what's with the perception that "law is tough and only the best of us shall do law"?